IT leaders: Are you confident in your technology adoption strategy? Benchmark your postpandemic emerging #technology adoption plans across organization using our roadmap: https://t.co/H5PzuFzEEU #GartnerSYM pic.twitter.com/RL4qpkz7B9
— Gartner for IT (@Gartner_IT) September 20, 2021
Technology Readiness Levels
TRL 1. Basic principles observed and reported
This is the lowest level of technology readiness. Scientific research begins to be translated into applied R&D. Examples might include paper studies of a technology’s basic properties or experimental work that consists mainly of observations of the physical world. Supporting Information includes published research or other references that identify the principles that underlie the technology.
TRL 2. Technology concept and/or application formulated
Once basic principles are observed, practical applications can be invented. Applications are speculative, and there may be no proof or detailed analysis to support the assumptions. Examples are still limited to analytic studies. Supporting information includes publications or other references that outline the application being considered and that provide analysis to support the concept. The step up from TRL 1 to TRL 2 moves the ideas from pure to applied research. Most of the work is analytical or paper studies with the emphasis on understanding the science better. Experimental work is designed to corroborate the basic scientific observations made during TRL 1 work.
TRL 3. Analytical and experimental critical function and/or characteristic proof of concept
Active research and development (R&D) is initiated. This includes analytical studies and laboratory-scale studies to physically validate the analytical predictions of separate elements of the technology. Examples include components that are not yet integrated or representative tested with simulants. Supporting information includes results of laboratory tests performed to measure parameters of interest and comparison to analytical predictions for critical subsystems. At TRL 3 the work has moved beyond the paper phase to experimental work that verifies that the concept works as expected on simulants. Components of the technology are validated, but there is no attempt to integrate the components into a complete system. Modeling and simulation may be used to complement physical experiments.
TRL 4. Component and/or system validation in laboratory environment
The basic technological components are integrated to establish that the pieces will work together. This is relatively “low fidelity” compared with the eventual system. Examples include integration of ad hoc hardware in a laboratory and testing with a range of simulants and small scale tests on actual waste. Supporting information includes the results of the integrated experiments and estimates of how the experimental components and experimental test results differ from the expected system performance goals. TRL 4-6 represent the bridge from scientific research to engineering. TRL 4 is the first step in determining whether the individual components will work together as a system. The laboratory system will probably be a mix of on hand
equipment and a few special purpose components that may require special handling, calibration, or alignment to get them to function.
TRL 5. Laboratory scale, similar system validation in relevant environment
The basic technological components are integrated so that the system configuration is similar to (matches) the final application in almost all respects. Examples include testing a high-fidelity, laboratory scale system in a simulated environment with a range of simulants and actual waste. Supporting information includes results from the laboratory scale testing, analysis of the differences between the laboratory and eventual operating system/environment, and analysis of what the experimental results mean for the eventual operating system/environment. The major difference between TRL 4 and 5 is the increase in the fidelity of the system and environment to the actual application. The system tested is almost prototypical.
TRL 6. Engineering/pilot-scale, similar (prototypical) system validation in relevant environment
Engineering-scale models or prototypes are tested in a relevant environment. This represents a major step up in a technology’s demonstrated readiness. Examples include testing an engineering
scale prototypical system with a range of simulants. Supporting information includes results from the engineering scale testing and analysis of the differences between the engineering scale, prototypical system/environment, and analysis of what the experimental results mean for the eventual operating system/environment. TRL 6 begins true engineering development of the technology as an operational system. The major difference between TRL 5 and 6 is the step up from laboratory scale to engineering scale and the determination of scaling factors that will enable design of the operating system. The prototype should be capable of performing all the functions that will be required of the operational system. The operating environment for the testing should closely represent the actual operating environment.
TRL 7. Full-scale, similar (prototypical) system demonstrated in relevant environment
This represents a major step up from TRL 6, requiring demonstration of an actual system prototype in a relevant environment. Examples include testing full-scale prototype in the field with a range of simulants in cold commissioning. Supporting information includes results from the full-scale testing and analysis of the differences between the test environment, and analysis of what the experimental results mean for the eventual operating system/environment. Final design is virtually complete.
TRL 8. Actual system completed and qualified through test and demonstration
The technology has been proven to work in its final form and under expected conditions. In almost all cases, this TRL represents the end of true system development. Examples include d developmental testing and evaluation of the system with actual waste in hot commissioning. Supporting information includes operational procedures that are virtually complete. An Operational Readiness Review (ORR) has been successfully completed prior to the start of hot testing.
TRL 9. Actual system operated over the full range of expected mission conditions
The technology is in its final form and operated under the full range of operating mission conditions. Examples include using the actual system with the full range of wastes in hot operations.
- AWS Announces Four New Storage Services and Capabilities
- QFT is the Next NFT
- Emerging Technologies to Watch in 2022
- Breakthrough Technologies 2021
- IDC FutureScape: Top 10 Predictions for the Future of Intelligence
- Australia gives priority to ultra low-cost solar
- Digital trends shaping the future of work
- Technologies could reduce 85–90% of GHG emissions in the EU
- Quantum supremacy is not the milestone we should care about
- Top 10 tech trends that will shape the coming decade
- Technology sector jumped to a market value of over $13 trillion during the pandemic
- Introducing M1 Pro and M1 Max: the most powerful chips Apple has ever built
- Blockchaining, AI and IoT are the three big technological developments that will change banking
- Ginkgo Bioworks has built the world’s largest DNA factory in a bid to alter the code behind life
- Discovering Technology Treasures Expo by Taiwan’s Ministry of Economic Affairs
- Technologies to Impact eCommerce
- Global power crunch: what you need to know
- 3 factors make most of the difference for small manufacturers
- Cloudflare R2 Storage directly challenges Amazon S3